Catastrophes as Turning Points (UNIB10013)

Undergraduate level 1Points: 12.5Dual-Delivery (Parkville)

You’re viewing the 2021 Handbook:
Or view archived Handbooks
You’re currently viewing the 2021 version of this subject
In 2021, there will be three delivery modes for your subjects – Dual-Delivery, Online and On Campus.
Please refer to the return to campus page for more information on these delivery modes and students who can enrol in each mode based on their location.

Overview

Availability
Semester 2 - Dual-Delivery
FeesLook up fees

There is much to be learned from failure, and in recent history there has been no shortage of examples of human-made catastrophes - the Bhopal Chemical spill, the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, the Challenger explosion, the Thalidomide disaster, the release of Cane Toads, the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown, the collapse of the West Gate bridge. Through a series of case studies, drawn from different disciplines and from different Faculties, students will appreciate the educative value of human-made catastrophe. Each may be seen as a turning point in our understanding of the world, and our place in it. Students will critically examine the dimensions of failure, the contested accounts of causes and explanations of failure, and will assess the professional, political, institutional, and public responses to failure. Students who successfully complete this subject will be able to convincingly interpret and respond to situations where things go badly wrong through an understanding of:

  • the educative value of human-made catastrophe;
  • the contexts in which things go wrong;
  • the range of factors and causes that are implicated in catastrophe;
  • the theoretical grounds upon which causal claims are made, and are contested;
  • critical assessments of common responses to human-made catastrophe.

Intended learning outcomes

Students who successfully complete this subject will:



  • develop an appreciation of the educative value of failure for our understanding of technical, scientific and economic systems;
  • demonstrate an ability to critically evaluate claims about the causes of failure;
  • demonstrate the ability to convincingly critique responses to failure;
  • develop a sound knowledge of the meaning of failure, the dimensions of failure, and the terms in which failure is said to occur;
  • develop a sound knowledge and understanding of iconic examples of failure;
  • develop an understanding of the methods and analytical skills required to conduct a small scale case study.

Last updated: 14 March 2025

Eligibility and requirements

Prerequisites

None

Corequisites

None

Non-allowed subjects

None

Inherent requirements (core participation requirements)

The University of Melbourne is committed to providing students with reasonable adjustments to assessment and participation under the Disability Standards for Education (2005), and the Assessment and Results Policy (MPF1326). Students are expected to meet the core participation requirements for their course. These can be viewed under Entry and Participation Requirements for the course outlines in the Handbook.

Further details on how to seek academic adjustments can be found on the Student Equity and Disability Support website: http://services.unimelb.edu.au/student-equity/home

Last updated: 14 March 2025

Assessment

DescriptionTimingPercentage

One essay presenting a critical account of the causes of catastrophe and the value of catastrophe in theoretical terms

  • 1500 words
Week 530%

A tutorial paper using the current week's case study, providing an account of the causes of the catastrophe, or the value of the catastrophe

From Week 5 to Week 1220%

case study using a case not covered in the readings, providing an account of the causes and the value of the catastrophe

  • 2000 words
End of semester50%
Hurdle requirement: Students must attend a minimum of 75% of tutorials in order to pass this subject. All pieces of written work must be submitted to pass this subject.Throughout the teaching periodN/A

Additional details

Note: Assessment submitted late without an approved extension will be penalised at 10% per day. After five days late assessment will not be marked. In-class tasks missed without approval will not be marked.

Last updated: 14 March 2025

Dates & times

  • Semester 2
    Principal coordinatorDarrin Durant
    Mode of deliveryDual-Delivery (Parkville)
    Contact hours35 hours - 2 x 1 hour lecture per week and 11 x 1 hour tutorials scheduled across the semester
    Total time commitment170 hours
    Teaching period26 July 2021 to 24 October 2021
    Last self-enrol date 6 August 2021
    Census date31 August 2021
    Last date to withdraw without fail24 September 2021
    Assessment period ends19 November 2021

    Semester 2 contact information

    Email: ddurant@unimelb.edu.au

Time commitment details

170 hours

Last updated: 14 March 2025

Further information

  • Texts

    Prescribed texts

    Subject readings will be available online.

    Recommended texts and other resources

    Wider Reading

    HortonForestW. and Dennis Lewis (Eds.) Great information disasters: twelve prime examples of how information mismanagement led to human misery, political misfortune and business failure.London,England, 1991.

    Landauer, Thomas. The Trouble with Computers, London, MIT Press, 1997.

    James C. Scott, Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven:YaleUniversityPress, 1998.

    Tenner, E. Why things bite back: technology and the revenge of unintended consequences, New York: Knopf, 1996.

    Winner, Langdon. The Whale and the Reactor, Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress, 1986.

    Lyytinen, K. and R. Hirschheim 1987. Information Systems Failures: A Survey and Classification of the Empirical Literature.OxfordSurveys in Information Technology (4): 257-309.

    Hall 1980. Great Planning Disasters. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies.New York: Basic Books.

    Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision : Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

    Joyce Fortune and Geoff Peters (2005) Information Systems: Achieving Success by Avoiding Failure. Wiley.

    Andrew Hopkins (2002) Lessons from Longford: The Esso Gas Plant Explosion. CCH Australia Ltd.

  • Breadth options

    This subject is available as breadth in the following courses:

  • Links to additional information

    http://breadth.unimelb.edu.au/home

  • Available through the Community Access Program

    About the Community Access Program (CAP)

    This subject is available through the Community Access Program (also called Single Subject Studies) which allows you to enrol in single subjects offered by the University of Melbourne, without the commitment required to complete a whole degree.

    Please note Single Subject Studies via Community Access Program is not available to student visa holders or applicants

    Entry requirements including prerequisites may apply. Please refer to the CAP applications page for further information.

  • Available to Study Abroad and/or Study Exchange Students

    This subject is available to students studying at the University from eligible overseas institutions on exchange and study abroad. Students are required to satisfy any listed requirements, such as pre- and co-requisites, for enrolment in the subject.

Last updated: 14 March 2025